Provocative Behavior of Drivers of Prestigious Vehicles regarding to the Provision of Road Traffic Safety

Authors: Borisova S.Ye.

Citation: Borisova S.Ye. Provocative Behavior of Drivers of Prestigious Vehicles regarding to the Provision of Road Traffic Safety.  Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. 2019. Vol. 24. No 1(76). Pp. 62–67. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2019-11009.

Для цитирования: Борисова С.Е. Провокационное поведение водителей престижных автомобилей в контексте обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2019. Т. 24. № 1(76). С. 62–67. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2019-11009.

Download article: Provocative Behavior of Drivers of Prestigious Vehicles regarding to the Provision of Road Traffic Safety

Abstract

Introduction. The article analyses actual incidents of provocative behavior of drivers of prestigious vehicles who grievously violate road traffic rules. The aim of the article is to ascertain the essence of drivers’ provocative behavior threatening the traffic security. Materials and Methods.  Results and Discussions. The mode of drivers’ provocative behavior is the manner of assumption of risk driving and intentional violation of Highway Code of the Russian Federation that may cause unintended and even tragic consequences
for road users. From the psychological point of view there is the demonstration of prestigious vehicle opportunities and a driver’s personal style of driving as a means and method of provocation under road traffic conditions as well as making videotape of driver’s behavior and later posting it online. Provocative behavior of drivers operating expensive vehicles corresponds to dangerous driving though they are not identical. Provocative driving behavior is often exhibited by representatives of elite youth who feel they act with impunity. The certainty of punishment and public reprimand are required in conjunction with the increased level of legal awareness and driving culture. Further development of issues concerning the influence of psychological features and drivers’ behavior on road traffic safety is also necessary. Conclusions. It is necessary to develop the measures improving the realization of comprehensive and systematic approach to solve the problem of provision of road traffic safety. It is essential to justify the need of the training of future drivers being at different age-related stages of the personality development; the training that is aimed at the inserting proper sections in educational programs and forming psychological and communicative competence of road traffic participants

Main Provisions:

Keywords: provocative behavior of drivers; prestigious vehicles; elite youth; traffic regulation rules; dangerous driving; road traffic safety; legal awareness.

Specialty: 19.00.06 Law Psychology; 19.00.05 Social Psychology

References:

1. Cherepakhin V. A. Provocative Behavior of a Victim and its Distinction from the Entrapment. Current Issues of Economy and Law. 2015. No 1. Pp. 271–277. (In Russ.)
2. Nikonovich S. L., Klimov A. S., Avdalyan A. Ya. Peculiarities of Criminal Law Assessment of Encouraging commission of an Assault. Bulletin of Russian New University. Series: Man and Society. 2017. No 2. Pp. 24–26. (In Russ.)
3. Namnyasova V. V. Criminal Law Assessment of Using Provocative Methods in Combatting Corruption. SCIENCE TIME. 2016. No 3(27). Pp. 359–367. (In Russ.)
4. Radachinsky S. N. Enhancement of Criminal Law Methods of Influence on Provocateurs and their Activity. North Caucasus Law Bulletin. 2010. No 3. Pp. 79–84. (In Russ.)
5. Dmitriyev A. V., Zadorozhnyuk I. E. Provocation: the Ambiguity of Notion and the Irremovability of a Phenomenon. A Man. 2016. No 3. Pp. 20–35. (In Russ.)
6. Nazarov E. I. Provocations in Mass Media and their Perception by the Youth Audience. Communicology. 2017. Vol. 5, No 3. Pp. ¬159–168. (In Russ.)
7. Dmitriyev A. V., Sychyev A. A. Provocation: Socio-philosophical Essays. Moscow, 2017. 336 p. (In Russ.)
8. Druzhinin A. M. Constructive Provocations: the Essence and Functional Characteristics. Topical Issues of Public Administration, Economy, Jurisprudence and Psychology: Collected Scientific Papers / Editor-in-chief A.M. Druzhinin. Moscow, 2015. Edition 2. Pp. 36–49. (In Russ.)
9. Ionkina E. Yu., Litvinova E. A. Certain Peculiarities of the Communicative Behavior of the Recipient being an Object of Provocative Action in the Portrait Interview (based on the German Language). Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2014. No 8-1(38). Pp. 87–90. (In Russ.)
10. Varlakova T. V. Speech Provocation as an Object of Judicial and Linguistic Examination. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013. No 4(51). Pp. 33–36. (In Russ.)
11. Doronina S. V. «Maybe we could come to an agreement, Chief!»: Methods of Discourse Analysis in the Linguistic Examination of Texts on Anti-corruption Matters. Political Linguistics. 2015. No 3. Pp. 245–249. (In Russ.)
12. Vorontsova T. A. Trolling and Flaming: Speech Aggression in Internet Communication. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: History and Philology. 2016. Vol. 26, No 2. Pp. 109–116. (In Russ.)
13. Bril’ M. S. Situations Encouraging Aggressive Behavior. Bulletin of Psychotherapy. 2011. No 39. Pp. 39–54. (In Russ.)
14. Lobanova Yu. I. About the Possibilities of Forecasting Accidents with Drivers. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Psychology. 2017. Vol. 10, No 1. Pp. 74–87. (In Russ.)
15. Polikarpova M. S. The Correlation between Notions of «Aggressive» and «Dangerous» Driving in Current Native and Foreign Psychology. Modern Foreign Psychology. 2017. Vol.6, No 1. Pp. 44–52. doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2017060106. (In Russ.)
16. Bulygina V. G., Dubinsky A. A., Shport S. V., Kalinkin D. S. Psychology of High Risky Driving (Review of Foreign Studies). Psychology and Law. 2016. Vol. 6, No 2. Pp. 72–92. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2016060206. (In Russ.)
17. Golubihina Yu. Yu., Goncharova N. A. Reliability of Professional Activity of Extreme Profile Drivers. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. 2014. No 3 (58). Pp. 3–6. (In Russ.)
18. Baranchikova M. V., Maltseva T. V. Peculiarities of the Preventive Impact made by means of Photography and Video Recording on the Road Traffic Violator Exceeding the Speed Limit. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. 2016. No 4 (67). Pp. 49–53. (In Russ.)
19. Zhiltsov A. V., Ivanov A. Yu. Towards the Aspects of Realization of Certain Legislative Initiatives in the Sphere of Road Traffic Safety Provisions. Juridical Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2017. No 1(39). Pp. 52–58. (In Russ.)
20. Petrov V. Ye. Social History of “Golden Youth”: Social and Historical Issues of Genesis. Historical and Social-Educational Idea. 2016. Vol. 8, No 6/2. Pp. 127–133. (In Russ.)
21. Shemetova T. N. Provocation as a Method in Modern Journalism: Thoughts on the Subject. Issues of Theory and Practice of Journalism. 2014. No 1. Pp. 54–65. (In Russ.)
22. Akhmadiyeva R. Sh. The Development of Personal Competence of a Road User. Kazan Pedagogical Journal. 2010. No 5–6. Pp. 11–18. (In Russ.)

Submitted: 29.04.2018