Authors: Мurasheva S. V.
Citation: Мurasheva S. V. Peculiarities of Adaptation of Migrants and their Interaction with the Population of the Adopting Regions of the Russian Federation. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. Vol. 24, No. 2 (77), 2019. Рp. 165–170 (In Russ.). DOI: 10. 24411/1999-6241-2019-12006
Для цитирования: Мурашева С. В. Специфика адаптации мигрантов и их взаимодействия с населением в принимающих регионах Российской Федерации // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2019. Т. 24, № 2(77). С. 165–170. DOI: 10. 24411/1999-6241-2019-12006
Download article: Peculiarities of Adaptation of Migrants and their Interaction with the Population in the Adopting Regions of the Russian Federation
Abstract
Introduction. Migration is a social demographic process with numerous crucial functions – social, political, economical, cultural etc. Migration can change the size of the population, its age and national components. The causes of migration vary: seeking for the job, improving house conditions, improving living conditions, etc. Мaterials and Methods. Questionnaires were used to study the specifics of interaction between the local population and migrants. 60 respondents of different age groups participated: from 22 to 32 (22 year-olds — 21%; 25 year-olds — 18; 26 year-olds — 9; 27 yearolds – 15; 28 year-olds – 15; 32 year-olds – 12%). Only 6% were represented by 42 year-olds and 3% by 52 year-olds. Results and Discussion. Population of many countries “suffers” from migrant-phobia and perceives migration primarily as otherethnic towards the dominant national majority of the regions. This gives the background to the rejection of migrants by the majority of the local people. Such an attitude may provoke tension and conflicts in interaction between migrants and the native people of the area and decreases possibilities of their successful adaptation and integration. Conclusions. It is necessary to take measures to prevent negative influence of migration processes and increase tolerance of the adopting society: multicultural education, overcoming language borders, migrants’ awareness of the fundamentals of the state system, history, cultural traditions and rules of conduct in the society of the adopting state, developing interpersonal communication etc.
Main Provisions:
1. Migrants in the adopting regions face the necessity to actively adapt to various elements of the social environment: professional, cultural, socially psychological, domestic etc.
2. The higher the level of migrants’ adaptation to new life conditions is, the more effective human resources are for development of the regions, and vice versa, increased conflict potential in the adopting areas reduces the level of migrants’ adaptation, decomposes the regional job market and enhances social tension.
Keywords: migration; migrant-phobia; migration processes; adaptation of migrants; ethnic tolerance; multicultural education.
13.00.01 General Psychology, History of Pedagogy and Education
References
1. Мurasheva S. V. The System of Establishing Ethnic Tolerance as the Basis of Integration of Juvenile Migrants into the Adopting Society and Prevention of Conflicts with Local People. Concept. 2015. Vol. 13. Pp. 796–800. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/85160.htm (accessed 18.06.2018). (In Russ.)
2. Reznik G. А., Amirova D. R. Migration as the Threat to the National Security of the State: International and National Aspects. Science Studies. 2016. vol. 8, No 6. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/82EVN616.pdf (accessed 18.06.2018). (In Russ.)
3. Makhmutov A. Kh., Peskova D. R. Migration Problems of the Modern Russia. Problems of Oriental Studies. 2014. No 2(64). Pp. 30–37. (In Russ.)
4. Trofimova I. N. Problems of Migrants’ Adaptation in the Modern Russia. University Bulletin. (State University of Management). 2013. No 8. Pp. 62–67. (In Russ.)
5. Akmalova A. А., Kapitsyn V. М. Social Work with Migrants and Refugees. Мoscow, 2013. 324 p. (In Russ.)
6. Goncharova N. P. Labour Migrants and Local Rural Citizens: Development of Relationships or Conflict of Interests? (Expert poll in Altay Region). Ostrovskiy Readings. 2014. No 1. Pp. 280–283. (In Russ.)
7. Sharipova М. R. Features of Migration Processes in the Regions of the Volga Federal District. Student Science and the 21st Century. 2017. No 2(15). Pp. 548–550. (In Russ.)
8. Gritsenko G. D., Maslova T. F., Dmitriev A. V. Migrants in the Social and Cultural Environment of the Region. Sociological Essays. Moscow, 2009. 247 p. (In Russ.)
9. Abdel Dzhalil N. А. Peculiarities of Migration and Migration Policy in Bryansk Region. PolitBook. 2017. No 3. Pp. 93–106. (In Russ.)
10. Khusnutdinova L. Integration and Adaptation of Other-Culture Migrants in the Ural-Volga Region. Problems of History, Philology, Culture. 2017. vol. 2, No 56. Pp. 179–195. (In Russ.)
11. Mozgovaya Е. I., Kulabukhov D. А. Problems of Migrants’ Social Adaptation in the Border Region. Social Work in the Modern World: Interaction of Science, Education and Practice. Materials of the 6th International Science-to-Practice Conference. Belgorod, 2014. Pp. 370–374. (In Russ.)
12. Artemov G. P., Aleynikov A. V., Pinkevich A. G. Dynamics of Attitude to Immigrants in Russia. Conflictology. 2016. Vol. 3. Pp. 186–197. (In Russ.)
13. Bozhenov S. A. Labour Migration and Its Perception in the Social Consciousness and Mass Media (Astrakhan region). Megalopolis Managemenet. 2010. No 4. Pp. 92–101. (In Russ.)
14. Bateneva Е. V. Problems of Cultural Adaptation of Economic Migrants from Central Asia in the Capital region. Bulletin of Moscow State Institute of Culture. 2012. No 6(50). Pp. 97–100. (In Russ.)
15. Pozdeev I. L. Problems of Adaptation of Labour Migrants from Central Asia in the Multi-ethnical region. Society and Power. 2014. No 1(45). Pp. 27–32. (In Russ.)
16. Savoskul M. S. Adaptation of Ethnic Migrants in Regions of Russia. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5: Geography. 2012. No 2. Pp. 59–64. (In Russ.) 17. Baranov А. V. Forced Migration from Ukraine to Krasnodar Region and its Regulation as a Factor of Interethnic Relations in the Region. Ethnic-Social Processes: Seeking Innovative Methodology. Maykop, 2016. Pp. 134–139. (In Russ.)
Submitted 19.07.2018