Authors: Vinogradov M. V., Kasperovich Yu. G., Karavaev A. F.
Citation: Vinogradov M. V., Kasperovich Yu. G., Karavaev A. F. Improved Psychophysiological Methods of Assessing Validity of Information given by an Individual. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. No 4(75). 2018. Pp. 96–102. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2018-14017.
Для цитирования: Виноградов М. В., Касперович Ю. Г., Караваев А. Ф. Совершенствование психофизиологических методов оценки достоверности информации, сообщаемой человеком // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2018. № 4(75). С. 96–102. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2018-14017.
Download article: Improved Psychophysiological Methods of Assessing Validity of Information given by an Individual
Abstract
The authors review the results of the 12th Annual Seminar for Polygraphologists inspected by the Autonomous non-profitable organization of vocational education “Centre of Applied Psychophysiology”. It is emphasized necessary for polygraphologists to employ the methods resulted from comprehensive scientific researches which have been standardized, their findings objectively assessed with the numerical data of the degree of the outcomes’ validity and probable mistakes. Under discussion are the results of certain scientific researches focused on technology of assessing validity of information provided by an individual according to the changes of pupillary diameter (eye-tracking) and effective usage of comparative questions of “probable lie” and “controlled lie” in polygraph testing. The review comprises the milestones in recent polygraphology in Russia and abroad, as well as the results of the seminar designed by David Ruskin, a leading polygraphologist of modern times, an honourable professor of the University of Utah (USA).
Keywords: polygraph, psychophysiological research, accuracy of polygraph testing, indefinite results.
References:
1. Komissarova Ya. V., Myagkikh N. I., Pelenitsyn A. B. Polygraph in Russia and the USA. Problems of Use. Мoscow, 2012. 120 p. (In Russ.)
2. Soshnikov A. P., Pelenitsyn A. B. Personnel Assessment. Psychological and Psycho-Physiological Methods. Personnel Security Maintenance. Мoscow, 2009. 60 p. (In Russ.)
3. Dashko M. N., Vinogradov M. V. Professional Psychological Selection of Applicants for Law Enforcement Agencies: New Approach to Studying Personal and Professional Qualities of Citizens applying for the job in Law Enforcement Agencies. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. No. 3(62). 2015. Pp. 101–106. (In Russ.)
4. Pelenitsyn A. B., Soshnikov A. P. Modern Technologies of Using Polygraph. Detailed Guidance for Practicing Polygraphologists. In 4 parts. Moscow, 2015. 80 p. (In Russ.)
5. Pelenitsyn A. B., Soshnikov A. P. Brief Guidance for Polygraph Testing. Мoscow, 2016. 60 p. (In Russ.)
6. Alexeev L. G., Zhirnov S. I., Korochkin P. B., Pryaslov G. A. Polygraphologist Guidebook. Мoscow, 2015. 90 p. (In Russ.)
7. Korochkin P. D., Alexeev L. G., Danilevich N. K., Komissarova Ya. V., Kudymets O. S., Scherbatykh O. V. Board Book for Polygraphologists. Moscow, 2018. 115 p. (In Russ.)
8. Raskin D., Honts C. R., Kircher J. C. Credibility Assessment: Scientific Research and Applications. Elsevier, 2014. 100 р.
9. Pelenitsyn A. B., Kazakov A. V., Soshnikov A. P. Basic Anatomy and Physiology for Polygraphologists. Мoscow, 2018. 205 p. (In Russ.)
10. Simakov A. I., Pelenitsyn A. B. Negotiator’s Own Informational Space and Virtual Projecting of Professional Competences. Мoscow, 2012. 80 p. (In Russ.)
11. Molchanov A. V. Not Utah. Мoscow, 2017.125 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kircher J. C., Raskin D. Laboratory and Field Research on the Ocular-motor Deception Test. European Polygraph. vol. 10., No. 4(38). 2016. Рр. 159–172.
13. Zhbankova O. V., Gusev V. B. Eye-tracking in Personnel Professional Selection. Experimental Psychology. 2018. vol. 11. No. 1. Pp. 156–165. (In Russ.)
14. Ruskin D., Honts C. R., Nelson R., Handler M. Monte Carlo Estimates of the Validity of Four Relevant Question Polygraph Examinations. Polygraph. v. 44. No.1b. 2015. Рр. 1–27.
Submitted: 27.03.2018