The Problem of Correlation of Legal Categories of “Freedom

Authors: Skidanova A. Ye., Koshelev E. V.

Citation: Skidanova A. Ye., Koshelev E. V. The Problem of Correlation of Legal Categories of “Freedom  of Conscience” and “Freedom of Religion”  in the Russian Federation. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. No 3(74). 2018. Pp. 100–102. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2018-13018.

Для цитирования: Скиданова А. Е., Кошелев Е. В. Проблема соотношения правовых категорий «свобода совести» и «свобода вероисповедания» в Российской Федерации // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2018. № 3(74). С. 100–102. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2018-13018.

Download article: The Problem of Correlation of Legal Categories of “Freedom  of Conscience” and “Freedom of Religion”  in the Russian Federation

Abstract

Implementing the right to freedom of conscience law enforcement agencies and citizens ambiguously interpret two legal  categories of “freedom of conscience” and “freedom of religion” and their correlation. Using the terms by the Russian legislation when  regulating freedom of conscience and freedom of religion causes the problem of defining the essence of the mentioned institutions  and their content. Freedom of conscience and freedom of religion cannot be considered as a unified legal institution as it happens  in the current Russian legal reality. Freedom of conscience and freedom of religion are different private freedoms, and, therefore, the  state should provide an independent guarantee system of implementation of each one of them. To achieve this it is necessary to  amend the Federal Law No. 125 “On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Groups”.

Keywords: freedom of conscience”, “freedom of religion”, law, correlation, problems, legislative regulation.

References:

1. Baglay M. V. Small Encyclopedia of Constitutional Law. Moscow, 1998. 519 p. (In Russ.)
2. Ivanyuk O. A. Freedom of Conscience and Freedom of Religion: Correlation of Concepts and Boundaries of Legislative Regulation.  Russian Law Journal. No. 9(165). 2010. Pp. 46–58. (In Russ.)
3. Kuznetsov A. O. Freedom of Conscience and Freedom of Religion: Problem of Distinguishing Concepts. Law Initiative. No. 1. 2015. P. 12–57.
4. Antoshin V. A. Freedom of Conscience and Freedom of Religion: Correlation of Concepts. Historical Fates of Atheism. Magnitogorsk,  2011. P. 139–141. (In Russ.)
5. Osin I. V. Freedom of Conscience as a Subjective Law. Constitutional and Municipal Law. No. 23. 2008. P. 26–28. (In Russ.)
6. Koroleva L. A., Melnichenko O. V. Freedom of Conscience and Freedom of Religion: to the Issue of Terms. Issues of Theory and  Practice. No. 5-1. 2011. Pp. 106–108. (In Russ.)
7. Zhdanova E. A. “Freedom of Conscience” and “Freedom of Religion”: Concept and Content. Current Socially-Economical Processes.  Penza, 2017. P. 105–107. (In Russ.)

Submitted: 10.12.2017