Authors: Elizarova E. I.
Citation: Elizarova E. I. Lawyers’ Mathematical Education as the Basis for Fundamentalization of Professional Training. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. No 2(73). 2018. Pp. 62–66. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2018-12010.
Для цитирования: Елизарова Е. И. Математическое образование юристов как основа фундаментализации профессиональной подготовки // Психопедагогика в правоохранительных органах. 2018. № 2(73). С. 62–66. DOI: 10.24411/1999-6241-2018-12010.
Download article: Lawyers’ Mathematical Education as the Basis for Fundamentalization of Professional Training
Abstract
The process of fundamentalization of legal professional education is provided with introduction of compulsory mathematical training into higher educational curricula. Mathematical methods are considered as a means of studying professional subjects and acquiring general cultural and professional competencies according to educational standards of the Russian Federation. The author establishes aims and tasks of mathematical education for lawyers, content and methods of teaching mathematics, describes experience of using the author’s methods of teaching mathematics to first-year students majoring in Law enforcement (40.05.02) at the Law Institute of the South Ural State University. The suggested method is based on using the elements of technology of cooperation, problem learning technology and adaptive learning technology. In combination of elements of point assessment the given method facilitates the formation of students’ own opinion, increases self-assessment, develops independent thinking, forms the competency to formulate and advocate own opinion, creates conditions for communicative skills. The results of using this method reveal that high level of motivation during the term enables the students to successfully master mathematics to the extent necessary to form general cultural competencies and pass interim assessment of academic progress. Further research of the problem of intensive mathematical training of law students aims at promotion of the method under study.
Keywords: fundamentalization of law education, mathematical training, competencies, learning technologies, active methods and forms of learning.
References:
1. Sibert G. A. American Lawyers’ Association and Legal Education in the USA. Legal Education in the USA. Vol. 7, no. 2. Pp. 13–18. URL: http://www.infousa.ru/laws/ijdr0802.pdf (accessed 30.08.2017). (In Russ.)
2. Gavaza T. A. Mathematics for Humanities Students. Challenges. Solutions. Pskov State University Herald. No. 6. 2008. Pp. 101–110. (In Russ.)
3. Kazantsev S. Ya., Zgadzai O. E., Safiullin N. Kh., Shevko N. R. Mathematics for Law Students. Ed. by Kazantsev S.Ya. Moscow, 2011. 224 p. (In Russ.)
4. Popov A. M., Sotnikov V. N., Nagaeva E. I., Akimov M. L. Informatics and Mathematics for Lawyers. Ed. by Popov A. M. Moscow, 2012. 509 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kertanova V. V., Kondaurova I. K. Development of Mathematic Skills and Cognition Independence in Students with regard to their Future Profession. Vestnik of Saratov State Technical University. No. 3(15). 2006. Pp. 260–264. (In Russ.)
6. Turetsky V. Ya. Mathematics and Informatics: tutorial for Humanities. Moscow, 2013. 558 p. URL: http://virtua.lib.susu.ru (accessed 24.05.2017). (In Russ.)
7. Lapshina I. E., Arkadyeva T. A., Valeeva M. A. Law Education Abroad. (USA and Germany). Scientific-Methodical Electronic Journal “Concept”. No. 12 (December). 2014. Pp. 166–170. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2014/14366.htm (accessed 25.06.2017). (In Russ.)
8. Bondarevskaya E. V. Theory and Practice of Personal-based Education. Rostov-on-Don, 2000. 351 p. (In Russ.)
9. Tamaio-Calabrese M., Kuk A., Meyer Sh. Constant Legal Education in the USA. Legal Education in the USA. Vol. 7. No. 2. 2002.
Pp. 19–25. URL: http://www.infousa.ru/laws/ijdr0802.pdf (accessed 26.06.2017).
Submitted: 27.09.2017